Selection favors the good gene combinations here, the ones containing two plus alleles and eliminates the bad gene combinations. In the absence of sex, the only variation that remains after several rounds of selection is hidden in the sense that plus alleles at the first site are found with minus alleles at the second site or vice versa. This problem is irrelevant in an infinitely large population, because mutation will immediately create beneficial combinations e.
Two populations are represented as black circles with fourteen line segments, each composed of four black plusses or minuses. The population at left, representing the Initial population, contains two line segments with two plus signs, seven line segments with one plus sign, and five line segments with zero plus signs. Arrows point to another population at right.. This resulting population also contains fourteen line segments, each containing two plus signs and two minus signs.
Eight of the line segments contain a minus sign, two plus signs, then one minus sign, whereas six of the line segments contain alternating plus and minus signs. This last result is particularly interesting, because it suggests that August Weismann might have been right all along in arguing that sex evolved to generate variation.
Modeling Weismann's hypothesis with infinitely large populations failed because variation is too easily generated by mutation and too easily maintained by selection within these populations. Altering this size-related assumption by modeling selection among a finite number of individuals reveals just how important sex and recombination are as processes that allow genes residing in different individuals to be brought together, thereby producing new genotypic combinations upon which selection can act.
De Visser, J. The evolution of sex: Empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nature Reviews Genetics 8 , — doi Felsenstein, J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics 78 , — Otto, S. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nature Reviews Genetics 3 , — link to article.
Origins of New Genes and Pseudogenes. Evolutionary Adaptation in the Human Lineage. Genetic Mutation. Negative Selection. Sexual Reproduction and the Evolution of Sex. Haldane's Rule: the Heterogametic Sex. Hybrid Incompatibility and Speciation.
Hybridization and Gene Flow. Why Should We Care about Species? Citation: Otto, S. Nature Education 1 1 What, then, are the true costs and benefits of sex? Aa Aa Aa. The Importance of Sexual Reproduction.
Indeed, theoretical models developed in the s and s demonstrate that genes promoting sex and recombination increase in frequency only when all of the following conditions hold true: The population is under directional selection.
This means that increased variation can improve the response to selection. Fitness surfaces are negatively curved. This means that sex and recombination can restore variation eliminated by past selection. The surface curvature is not too strong. If too strong, the recombination load is severe. Genetics 78 , — Otto, S. Article History Close. Share Cancel. The price they would pay, however, would be an alarming genetic bottleneck. When a gene pool is small, the risk of birth defects and other illnesses rises.
Take the European royal families, nearly all of which are in some way related. Prognathism, a deformity that causes the lower jaw to jut out, is so common within the European royals that they lent the condition its common name, the Habsburg lip. In a normal population this condition would be diluted out, but in the tightly-knit European royals it emerged again and again.
Just as inbreeding reduces genetic diversity of a population, self-fertilisation can reduce the genetic diversity of your offspring. If you chose to reproduce entirely on your own, your child would only have one parent, and thus half the genetic diversity available to a normal child. Each subsequent generation of single-parent reproduction would continue that trend, with the increasing risk that normally hidden defects would surface.
Follow Lawrence Rifkin on Twitter. Already a subscriber? Sign in. Thanks for reading Scientific American. Create your free account or Sign in to continue. See Subscription Options. Discover World-Changing Science. What can -- and cannot -- be learned from evolution From an evolutionary gene's-eye perspective, the genes are immortal, and our role, the meaning of life, is to perpetuate the genes.
In children, we cheat death. Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter. Sign Up. Read More Previous. Support science journalism. Knowledge awaits. See Subscription Options Already a subscriber? Create Account See Subscription Options. Continue reading with a Scientific American subscription.
Subscribe Now You may cancel at any time. NHS doctors can refuse to perform sterilisation operations if they believe the procedure is not in the best interests of the patient. Despite some of the nihilist rhetoric in anti-natalist groups, there's no indication that they're a violent threat.
When they do talk about extinction it often feels as though it's a debating exercise. No-one in their online communities is threatening murder or violence. Thomas's idea of blowing a hole in the side of the earth - he imagines a big red button that would end human life and says he'd "press that in an instant" - is actually highly controversial because of a key anti-natalist principle: consent. Put simply, it's the idea that creating or destroying life requires the consent of the person who will be born or die.
Kirk lives in San Antonio, Texas. He says he recalls a conversation with his mother when he was just four years old. She told him that having children was a choice. Kirk says that even at that young age, he became an anti-natalist. He opposes the creation of human life because none of us were explicitly asked if we wanted to be here. The concept also works in reverse. The problem with that big red humanity-eraser button is that plenty of people enjoy life - and not everyone would consent to it all coming to an end.
Instead, Kirk and most anti-natalists want people to volunteer to stop giving birth. There's another distinct theme common in anti-natalist groups. Posters frequently share experiences of their own mental health, and occasionally condemn those with mental health problems for having children. One post included a screenshot of a post from another user that read: "I have a borderline personality disorder, in addition to bipolar and generalized anxiety".
The anti-natalist added their own comment: "This individual has two kids.
0コメント